Short Answer
Focus on specific work output, expectations, resources, timelines, and measurable improvement.
Use safer manager wording for performance conversations and coaching messages.
Retaliation remains the #1 claim filed with the EEOC, representing 56% of all charges filed, making warning wording critical.
Focus on specific work output, expectations, resources, timelines, and measurable improvement.
Performance conversations become risky when they include assumptions, threats, or protected-context references.
"Your personal problems are clearly affecting your performance."
"Let's review the specific performance expectations, the observed gaps, and the support or timeline needed for improvement."
Performance conversations must be separated from speculation about an employee's personal life or medical status. Probing into personal affairs or diagnosing employees' issues creates high legal exposure under the ADA.
The ADA's 'regarded as' prong protects employees whom employers perceive as having a disability. Speculating that performance drops are due to 'mental health' or 'personal medical problems' can lead to 'regarded as' discrimination claims.
Compare how the conversation unfolds under risky vs. compliance-aligned wording.
How managers should handle accommodation requests step-by-step to avoid retaliation triggers.
Employee requests assistance or indicates a medical limitation impacting their work.
Manager routes the request immediately to HR to protect medical privacy and ensure formal oversight.
Discuss functional limitations and explore accommodations without requesting diagnosis details.
Formally document the agreed-upon accommodation. Track and review progress independently of performance reviews.
Review official guidelines directly on government and educational portals to confirm compliant interactive process duties.
Ensure that performance standards are applied consistently across the workforce. If the gap arises after a protected activity (e.g., filing a complaint), the manager must rely on pre-existing, quantitative records of performance rather than subjective, newly introduced metrics, and consult HR before taking action.
Protected activity includes opposing unlawful employment practices (e.g., complaining to HR about peer harassment, requesting accommodations, filing wage disputes) or participating in compliance investigations. Employers are strictly prohibited from demoting, transferring, or otherwise penalizing workers for engaging in these activities.
Pretext occurs when an employer offers a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for discipline or termination, but the employee proves that the stated reason is false or a cover-up for retaliatory intent. Shifting explanations, inconsistent policy enforcement, or manager comments indicating frustration are common proofs of pretext.
Privacy Warning & Data Minimization
Please do not paste real employee names, emails, case IDs, or specific medical details. Replace sensitive identifiers with placeholders like [Employee] or [Condition] to keep historical logs anonymous. Analyses may be saved to your dashboard history, and are never used to train public AI models.
Continue through the Performance & Discipline scenario hub for more examples in this topic cluster.
Termination Wording Examples for HR
Scenario TemplateEmployee Write-Up for Attitude: Safer Wording
Scenario TemplateEmployee Warning for Insubordination Wording
Scenario TemplateEmployee Final Warning Wording Examples
Scenario TemplateEmployee PIP Wording Examples
Scenario TemplateEmployee Write-Up Examples With Safer HR Wording
Use these resources to turn this wording example into a repeatable HR review workflow.
Analyze warning letters, coaching notes, and performance drafts.
Save review outputs for client-ready or internal documentation.
Turn manager feedback into objective, safer coaching language.
Try this scenario with your own wording
Use the checker to identify FMLA, ADA, EEOC, attendance, and discipline phrasing that may need HR review.
Chief HR Compliance Advisor & Labor Counsel
Sarah is a veteran labor attorney and compliance specialist with over 15 years of experience advising corporate leaders on ADA, FMLA, Title VII, and OSHA regulations. She received her Juris Doctor (JD) from Georgetown Law Center and holds a Senior Professional in Human Resources (SPHR) certification.